"Terrific historical tale"
In 1817 Earl Edward Carsington is tired of paying the
bills for his third of five sons and the oldest unmarried
one. He demands that Alistair in his late twenties either
finds a wealthy wife or earns income through business.
Rather than wed, the melancholy war "hero" joins his
friend Lord Gordmor in building a canal in Derbyshire. Some of the local landowners oppose the project so
Alistair heads north to persuade them to support the canal
endeavor. The opposition leader is spinster Mirabel
Oldridge who is a couple of years older than Alistair. As
she deftly sabotages his support through her silver
tongue, they fall in love. However, he believes the canal
is a boom while she believes it is a bust leaving a gap
wider than his proposal to keep them apart. Fans will enjoy this wonderful Regency romance that takes
the contemporary issue of environment vs. development back
to its roots in early nineteenth century England. The
story line is crisp as Mirabel and Alistair debate the
merits and demerits of the impact of a canal on the
locality even as both fall in love. The secondary cast
adds depth to the debate so that the audience receives a
terrific historical tale with modern day implications. Harriet Klausner
Reviewed by Harriet Klausner
Posted February 27, 2004
SummaryAlistair Carsington really, really wishes he didn't love
women quite so much. To escape his worst impulses, he sets
out for a place far from civilization: Derbyshire--in
winter!--where he hopes to kill two birds with one stone:
avoid all temptation, and repay the friend who saved his
life on the fields of Waterloo. But this noble aim drops
him straight into opposition with Miss Mirabel Oldridge, a
woman every bit as intelligent, obstinate, and devious as
he—and maddeningly irresistible.
Mirabel Oldridge already has her hands full keeping her
brilliant and aggravatingly eccentric father out of
trouble. The last thing she needs is a stunningly
attractive, oversensitive and overbright aristocrat
reminding her she has a heart--not to mention a body he
claims is so unstylishly clothed that undressing her is
practically a civic duty.
Could the situation be any worse? And why does something
that seems so wrong feel so very wonderful?
|