"Do we have the right to judge the actions of our parents?"
The title, THE DISCOVERY OF LUMINOUS BEING, led me to
believe that I was about to read a novel about an alien,
who glows in the dark.
However, after reading the first few paragraphs, I knew
this was not to be, and frankly I was not disappointed. Novelist Anthony Maulucci delivered something far
different, and his principle character, Raphael Trager, is
certainly no alien. In fact, Raphael is someone, who
probably is familiar to many of us. After graduating from Wesleyan University in Connecticut,
Raphael decides to visit his artist father, who lives in
Montreal. Apparently, this is his first visit to Montreal
since the age of five, when he had traveled here with his
parents before their separation.
This time, however, it was a journey to confront his
intense and complex conflict with his father, who was more
preoccupied with his art than with his family.
A conflict that stemmed even prior to the day his father
had abandoned him and his mother and sister. The opening chapter of the book sets the stage, when
Raphael's father apologizes for not having attended his
son's graduation, and his excuse being-that he had to meet
a deadline to complete a mural project. This is enough to trigger Raphael's anger in reminding him
that his father was never present when it counted, such as
school plays and other events.
He now questions himself as to why he has visited his
father- "if not to accuse him" Maulucci effectively portrays the struggles between an
angry young son and a carefree egotistical father. We come
away convinced that both characters are flesh-and-blood
people, and their issues are very much contemporary. However, we are also reminded through the interweaving of
the words and actions of two other characters, the father's
neighbor, Rabbi Klein and Raphael's girlfriend, Suzanne,
that there are never two sides to a conflict, but perhaps
three, four or a dozen.
Choices are seldom clear, and even doing the right thing
can sometimes lead to unforeseen and unfortunate
consequences.
As Raphael concludes, his father may have abandoned him
at a very tender age, however, did he have the right to
condemn him for that? He had wanted to hurt him, although
in retrospect, he didn't think he succeeded. Furthermore,
did his father really care if he hated him or not? As for the unusual title of the book, when I interviewed
the author, he cleverly explained to me "it captures the
essence of the central character's most profound
realization about his young life, but I thought readers
would find it intriguing and want to find out what it
means." I must admit it certainly piqued my curiosity.
Reviewed by Norman Goldman
Courtesy Bookpleasures
Posted July 31, 2003
|