"Was America's Intelligence Community To Blame for Sept 11?"
The principal premise of best selling author Bill Gertz's
book Breakdown: How America's Intelligence Failures Led to
September 11, is that there was a monumental screw up of
the intelligence community in Washington. There are certainly many revelations of the book that are
nothing more than a rehashing of various news stories
presented over the past year by the media. Nevertheless,
the synthesizing of this information definitely helps the
reader to better understand the root causes of the
breakdown. Gertz provides the reader with impressive evidence to
support his contention that Sept 11th could have been
prevented, if the intelligence community had worked
together in harmony.
In order to defend his case, the author relies heavily on
information gleaned from congressional hearings, court
documents, classified memos, foreign governmental reports
and letters, speeches and personal interviews with some of
the former employees of the intelligence services. Each chapter examines a different branch of the US
intelligence apparatus and how they were all guilty of
incompetence. He further adds that even Congress was a
partner and should likewise share the blame, and its
oversight of intelligence-or lack of it, or wrong use of it-
is a prime cause of the intelligence breakdown that led to
September 11. No doubt the reader will find some of Gertz's findings
lethal. For example, he refers to the Phoenix Memo, where
special agent Kenneth Williams from his Phoenix office
wrote to FBI headquarters on July 10, 2001 that they should
accumulate a listing of civil aviation
universities/colleges around the world.
More than a year before Williams was involved in
investigating some of the students attending this civil
aviation universities and colleges. The FBI never took his
warning seriously, and as mentioned in the book, "it did
not get analyzed, and it was not shared with other
intelligence agencies or even other FBI field offices,
except New York." Although at times the wealth of information may be
difficult to immediately digest, there is no doubt a bitter
aftertaste left in one's mouth once you ponder over some of
the author's findings.
This information packed book is nevertheless a welcome and
discussion-provoking addition to the growing body of
literature on this important subject matter.
Reviewed by Norman Goldman
Posted November 19, 2002
|